It's hard at first to understand if this is a character who you would like to understand and care for when it's introduced as such a poor sight but yet already shows signs of human nature coming through, for instance at the beginning of the novel when Victor wakes and sees the monster at his bedside, "while a grin wrinkled his cheeks," (35). Thinking of the nature of the mind only highlights the nature aspect in this book as a whole.
While Frankenstein's monster becomes more and more human via the nature of his origins, it is also stressed that Victor is one to respect nature, often venturing paths and finding beauty in the simplest things. After the murder of his youngest brother, William, and the execution of the number one suspect, Justine (an old friend to the Frankenstein family) as an extension of that, Victor veers himself away from society, bringing himself to a state of complete emotional sobriety. He consoles his hidden troubles by walking and observing the world around him, bringing a slight happiness, but not enough to cure his near-suicidal thought process. As the world around him seems brighter, though, he is again confronted by the monster at a glacier at the summit of Montanvert. From here, the monster has proved his worthiness of entrance into the world that continues to refuse him access. He has learned languages, how to understand and control senses, and what life should mean no matter the hardships, telling Victor "Life, although it may only be an accumulation of anguish, is dear to me, and I will defend it," (66).
The monster then further proves his right to be just as much a part of this world as his neighbors by moving into a hut and observing a foreign village and again beginning to understand their language, their lifestyles, their history, etc.
Watching the monster not necessarily mature but grow into something more and more comparable to a human being brings me closer to him, making me feel for this character more than many contemporary books can. Mary Shelley's ability to combine topics on worldly nature and draw parallels to human nature has given me feelings for a character who in real life it would be a challenge to feel for.
I'm intrigued by this section of your post: "While Frankenstein's monster becomes more and more human via the nature of his origins, it is also stressed that Victor is one to respect nature, often venturing paths and finding beauty in the simplest things. After the murder of his youngest brother, William, and the execution of the number one suspect, Justine (an old friend to the Frankenstein family) as an extension of that, Victor veers himself away from society, bringing himself to a state of complete emotional sobriety. He consoles his hidden troubles by walking and observing the world around him, bringing a slight happiness, but not enough to cure his near-suicidal thought process."
ReplyDeleteI'm wondering if what we see here is the emergence of "modern consciousness" that J. Paul Hunter talks about in his introduction to the novel. For instance, compare Ambrosio's complete lack of self reflection to Frankenstein's here. Although it's arguable, Ambrosio seems so much more of a straight-up villain without much remorse, while Frankenstein is so much more complex. He's conflicted, guilt-ridden, repressed. How do you think nature *symbollically* works to express (or enhance?) these sorts of "modern" feelings and conditions?